Client Questionnaire Intake & Translation for Personal Injury Attorneys with Filevine

Filevine Personal Injury Attorney Plaintiff PI

The Problem

Plaintiff PI intake questionnaires come back incomplete, in three languages, with mismatched dates and missing employer details — the paralegal spends the day cleaning them up.

What We Build in Filevine

AI ingests the questionnaire in any language, translates and normalizes it, validates dates against supporting docs, flags inconsistencies, and loads structured data into Litify. Purpose-built for teams running Filevine — uses the native API or agent integration so nothing leaves the system of record.

Filevine Integration Approach

1

Audit your Filevine configuration

We map the specific Filevine objects, custom fields, and workflows the automation needs to touch for your plaintiff pi practice.

2

Build on the Filevine API or agent

Integration happens inside Filevine — no data leaves the system, no parallel tool for your team to learn, no license changes.

3

Human-in-the-loop handoff

Every automation routes exceptions back to a human in Filevine with enough context to act — AI handles the 80%, your team owns the judgment calls.

See this running in your Filevine instance

30-minute call. We'll look at your actual Filevine setup and show exactly how this workflow fits.

More About This Workflow

Client Questionnaire Intake & Translation for Personal Injury Attorneys

AI ingests the questionnaire in any language, translates and normalizes it, validates dates against supporting docs, flags inconsistencies, and loads structured data into Litify.

Other Filevine Automations