Client Intake & Conflict Screening for IP Attorneys with ipManager

ipManager IP Attorney Patent Prosecution

The Problem

Every new Patent Prosecution lead needs conflict-checked, fee-agreement-drafted, and intake-form-filled before a billable moment happens — and 40% of leads ghost during that gap.

What We Build in ipManager

AI runs the conflict check against ipManager, drafts the fee agreement, sends the intake packet, and books the consult — lead-to-consult time drops from 4 days to under 4 hours. Purpose-built for teams running ipManager — uses the native API or agent integration so nothing leaves the system of record.

ipManager Integration Approach

1

Audit your ipManager configuration

We map the specific ipManager objects, custom fields, and workflows the automation needs to touch for your patent prosecution practice.

2

Build on the ipManager API or agent

Integration happens inside ipManager — no data leaves the system, no parallel tool for your team to learn, no license changes.

3

Human-in-the-loop handoff

Every automation routes exceptions back to a human in ipManager with enough context to act — AI handles the 80%, your team owns the judgment calls.

See this running in your ipManager instance

30-minute call. We'll look at your actual ipManager setup and show exactly how this workflow fits.

More About This Workflow

Client Intake & Conflict Screening for IP Attorneys

AI runs the conflict check against ipManager, drafts the fee agreement, sends the intake packet, and books the consult — lead-to-consult time drops from 4 days to under 4 hours.

Other ipManager Automations