Client Questionnaire Intake & Translation for Litigation Attorneys with Clio

Clio Litigation Attorney Commercial Litigation

The Problem

Commercial Litigation intake questionnaires come back incomplete, in three languages, with mismatched dates and missing employer details — the paralegal spends the day cleaning them up.

What We Build in Clio

AI ingests the questionnaire in any language, translates and normalizes it, validates dates against supporting docs, flags inconsistencies, and loads structured data into Relativity. Purpose-built for teams running Clio — uses the native API or agent integration so nothing leaves the system of record.

Clio Integration Approach

1

Audit your Clio configuration

We map the specific Clio objects, custom fields, and workflows the automation needs to touch for your commercial litigation practice.

2

Build on the Clio API or agent

Integration happens inside Clio — no data leaves the system, no parallel tool for your team to learn, no license changes.

3

Human-in-the-loop handoff

Every automation routes exceptions back to a human in Clio with enough context to act — AI handles the 80%, your team owns the judgment calls.

See this running in your Clio instance

30-minute call. We'll look at your actual Clio setup and show exactly how this workflow fits.

More About This Workflow

Client Questionnaire Intake & Translation for Litigation Attorneys

AI ingests the questionnaire in any language, translates and normalizes it, validates dates against supporting docs, flags inconsistencies, and loads structured data into Relativity.

Other Clio Automations