Medical Records Retrieval & Chronology for Litigation Attorneys with Clio

Clio Litigation Attorney Commercial Litigation

The Problem

Commercial Litigation cases need medical records from 8 providers, and each one sends 400 pages in a different format — the chronology is a week of paralegal time per matter.

What We Build in Clio

AI requests records via HITECH, ingests them into Relativity, builds a chronological medical timeline with visit-level detail, and flags gaps — demand package goes out in days, not weeks. Purpose-built for teams running Clio — uses the native API or agent integration so nothing leaves the system of record.

Clio Integration Approach

1

Audit your Clio configuration

We map the specific Clio objects, custom fields, and workflows the automation needs to touch for your commercial litigation practice.

2

Build on the Clio API or agent

Integration happens inside Clio — no data leaves the system, no parallel tool for your team to learn, no license changes.

3

Human-in-the-loop handoff

Every automation routes exceptions back to a human in Clio with enough context to act — AI handles the 80%, your team owns the judgment calls.

See this running in your Clio instance

30-minute call. We'll look at your actual Clio setup and show exactly how this workflow fits.

More About This Workflow

Medical Records Retrieval & Chronology for Litigation Attorneys

AI requests records via HITECH, ingests them into Relativity, builds a chronological medical timeline with visit-level detail, and flags gaps — demand package goes out in days, not weeks.

Other Clio Automations