Patent Prior Art Search for Personal Injury Attorneys with CASEpeer
The Problem
Prior art searches for Plaintiff PI matters take days in Litify, and the attorney still has to read every hit to judge relevance.
What We Build in CASEpeer
AI runs the search across USPTO, EPO, and Litify, ranks hits by claim-overlap relevance, summarizes each, and builds the search report — attorney starts from a triaged list, not a raw dump. Purpose-built for teams running CASEpeer — uses the native API or agent integration so nothing leaves the system of record.
CASEpeer Integration Approach
Audit your CASEpeer configuration
We map the specific CASEpeer objects, custom fields, and workflows the automation needs to touch for your plaintiff pi practice.
Build on the CASEpeer API or agent
Integration happens inside CASEpeer — no data leaves the system, no parallel tool for your team to learn, no license changes.
Human-in-the-loop handoff
Every automation routes exceptions back to a human in CASEpeer with enough context to act — AI handles the 80%, your team owns the judgment calls.
See this running in your CASEpeer instance
30-minute call. We'll look at your actual CASEpeer setup and show exactly how this workflow fits.